Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2022

SCDSS v. Donald Chisholm

SCDSS v. Donald Chisholm
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided June 21, 2022

SCDSS v. Donald Chisholm

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Candace Griggs and Donald Chisolm, Defendants, Of whom Donald Chisolm is the Appellant.

In the interests of minors under the age of 18.

Appellate Case No. 2021-001239

Appeal From Darlington County Cely Anne Brigman, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-272 Submitted June 17, 2022 โ€“ Filed June 21, 2022

AFFIRMED

Heather Vry Scalzo, of Offit Kurman, of Spartanburg, for Appellant.

Christopher Craig Jackson, of Chris Jackson Law Firm LLC, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Stuart Wesley Snow, Jr., of Snow & Bailey Law Firm, P.A., of Florence, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Donald Chisolm appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Chisholm's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.