State v. Allen
State v. Allen
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Anthony Bernard Allen, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001766
Appeal From Greenville County Letitia H. Verdin, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-238 Submitted May 1, 2022 – Filed June 8, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.