Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2022

SCDSS v. Ericka James

SCDSS v. Ericka James
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided July 14, 2022

SCDSS v. Ericka James

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Ericka S. James, Michael Martin, and John Doe, Defendants, Of whom Ericka S. James is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2021-001133

Appeal From Spartanburg County Kimaka Nichols-Graham, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-300 Submitted July 13, 2022 โ€“ Filed July 14, 2022

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Robert C. Rhoden, III, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

Wendy Nicole Griffith, of Talley Law Firm, P.A., of Spartanburg, for the Guardians ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Ericka S. James appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve James's counsel.

AFFIRMED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.