State v. Jonathan Art Lincoln
State v. Jonathan Art Lincoln
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Jonathan Art Lincoln, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2021-000863
Appeal From Aiken County Jocelyn Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-393 Submitted October 11, 2022 – Filed October 26, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Jonathan Art Lincoln, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., THOMAS J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.