State v. Quincy L. Hemphill
State v. Quincy L. Hemphill
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Quincy Lakeith Hemphill, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2019-001807
Appeal From York County William A. McKinnon, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-448 Submitted November 1, 2022 – Filed December 14, 2022
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M.
Blitch, Jr., of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., THOMAS, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.