State v. Anthony T. McKennie
State v. Anthony T. McKennie
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Anthony Tyrone McKennie, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2021-000382
Appeal From Orangeburg County Edgar W. Dickson, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-168 Submitted April 1, 2023 – Filed May 3, 2023
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and GEATHERS and VERDIN, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.