Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2023

Salmans v. McDonald

Salmans v. McDonald
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided January 12, 2023

Salmans v. McDonald

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Serena Joy Stacy Salmans and Dillon Levi Salmans, Respondents, v. Nakeisha McDonald, Charles Sabb, and South Carolina Department of Social Services, Defendants, Of whom Nakeisha McDonald is the Appellant and Charles Sabb and South Carolina Department of Social Services are Respondents.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2022-001136

Appeal From Richland County C. Vance Stricklin, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-018 Submitted January 5, 2023 โ€“ Filed January 12, 2023

AFFIRMED Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of Union, for Appellant.

Larry Dale Dove, of Thompson Dove Law Group LLC, of Rock Hill, for Respondents Serena Joy Stacy Salmans and Dillon Levi Salmans.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent South Carolina Department of Social Services.

Charles Saab, of North Charleston, pro se.

Almand James Barron, of The Law Offices of Shea and Barron, of Columbia, as the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Nakeisha McDonald appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.

Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve McDonald's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 KONDUROS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.