Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2023

SCDSS v. Allison

SCDSS v. Allison
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided January 3, 2023

SCDSS v. Allison

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Kesha Danielle Johnson-Allison and Jim T. Allison, Defendants, Of whom Jim T. Allison is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2022-000594

Appeal From Spartanburg County M. Todd Thigpen, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-008 Submitted December 20, 2022 – Filed January 3, 2023

AFFIRMED

Nancy Carol Fennell, of Irmo, for Appellant.

Alex Kinlaw, III, of Greenville, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.

Kathryn J. Walsh, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

Wendy Nicole Griffith, of Talley Law Firm, P.A., of Spartanburg, for the Guardian ad Litem for the minor children.

PER CURIAM: Jim T. Allison appeals the family court's final order finding he physically and medically neglected his minor children (Children), finding he placed Children at a substantial risk of physical abuse, and terminating his parental rights to Children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-20(6)(a)(i), (iii) (Supp. 2022); S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Allison's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1 GEATHERS, MCDONALD, and HILL, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.