State v. Christopher Lee Sanders
State v. Christopher Lee Sanders
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Lee Sanders, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2021-000563
Appeal From Aiken County Courtney Clyburn Pope, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-159 Submitted April 1, 2023 – Filed April 26, 2023
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens, of Columbia, and Christopher Lee Sanders, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.