Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2023

Nathaniel Bradley v. State

Nathaniel Bradley v. State
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided December 20, 2023

Nathaniel Bradley v. State

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Nathaniel Bradley, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-001121

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI

Appeal From Sumter County R. Ferrell Cothran, Jr., Trial Judge George C. James, Jr., Post-Conviction Relief Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-405 Submitted December 1, 2023 – Filed December 20, 2023

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Joshua Abraham Edwards, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the post-conviction relief (PCR) court's denial of Nathaniel Bradley's application for PCR. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 1 THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.