Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2024

SCDSS v. Prescott

SCDSS v. Prescott
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided September 4, 2024

SCDSS v. Prescott

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Erin Prescott and Andreau Conyers, Defendants, Of whom Erin Prescott is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2023-001795

Appeal From Aiken County Angela W. Abstance, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-307 Submitted August 28, 2024 โ€“ Filed September 4, 2024

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.

Amy Patterson Shumpert, of Nance & McCants, of Aiken, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Erin Prescott appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED. 1 KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.