Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2024

Wright v. State

Wright v. State
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided January 10, 2024

Wright v. State

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Robert Lee Wright, Petitioner, v. State of South Carolina, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2018-002249

Appeal From Charleston County Kristi Harrington, Trial Judge Thomas A. Russo, Post-Conviction Relief Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-015 Submitted December 1, 2023 – Filed January 10, 2024

CERTIORARI DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of Columbia, for Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Danielle Dixon, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: We issued a writ of certiorari to review the post-conviction relief (PCR) court's denial of Robert Lee Wright's application for PCR. We now dismiss the writ as improvidently granted.

DISMISSED AS IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED. 1 THOMAS and GEATHERS, JJ., and BROMELL HOLMES, A.J., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.