State v. Hope
State v. Hope
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Ramon Rodrigo Hope, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2022-000454
Appeal From York County Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-138 Submitted April 1, 2024 – Filed May 1, 2024
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, and Ramon Rodrigo Hope, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Kevin Scott Brackett, of York, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and VERDIN, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.