Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2024

State v. Dixon

State v. Dixon
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided May 1, 2024

State v. Dixon

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Shakel Rakeem Dixon, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000948

Appeal From Aiken County Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge,

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-151 Submitted April 1, 2024 – Filed May 1, 2024

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Shakel Rakeem Dixon, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 GEATHERS, HEWITT, and VINSON, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.