Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2024

SCDSS v. Tiffany Pickles

SCDSS v. Tiffany Pickles
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided July 18, 2024

SCDSS v. Tiffany Pickles

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Tiffany Pickles and Marion Chavez a/k/a Mario Garcia, Defendants, Of whom Tiffany Pickles is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2023-000893

Appeal From Greenville County Jessica Ann Salvini, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-269 Submitted July 17, 2024 โ€“ Filed July 18, 2024

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, both of The Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Lewis Lesesne Hendricks, Jr., of The Hendricks Firm, LLC, of Easley, as Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.

Rebecca Rush Wray, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.

Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem for the minor child.

PER CURIAM: Tiffany Pickles appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and TURNER, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.