State v. Ivington D. Allen
State v. Ivington D. Allen
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Ivington Daniel Allen, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2022-000638
Appeal From Dorchester County Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-400 Submitted November 21, 2024 – Filed November 27, 2024
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia; and Ivington Daniel Allen, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 KONDUROS, GEATHERS and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.