State v. Braylon L. Morris
State v. Braylon L. Morris
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Braylon Lamar Morris, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2022-000898
Appeal From Pickens County Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2024-UP-392 Submitted November 21, 2024 – Filed November 27, 2024
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Braylon Lamar Morris, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.