State v. Preston E. Hancock
State v. Preston E. Hancock
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Preston Emmanuel Hancock, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2022-001742
Appeal From Greenville County Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-055 Submitted January 31, 2025 – Filed February 12, 2025
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Preston Emmanuel Hancock, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, all for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and MCDONALD and TURNER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.