State v. Kari K. Ryant
State v. Kari K. Ryant
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Kari Kayshon Ryant, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-000911
Appeal From Orangeburg County Heath P. Taylor, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-051 Submitted January 30, 2025 – Filed February 12, 2025
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia; and Kari Kayshon Ryant, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and MCDONALD and TURNER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.