State v. Kadidas R. Gossett
State v. Kadidas R. Gossett
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Kadidas Reaco Gossett, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2024-000743
Appeal From Spartanburg County R. Keith Kelly, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-065 Submitted February 20, 2025 – Filed February 26, 2025
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, for Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 THOMAS, HEWITT, and CURTIS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.