SCDSS v. Dustin R. Floyd
SCDSS v. Dustin R. Floyd
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Danielle Nichole Kelly, Dustin Ryan Floyd a/k/a Dustin Ryan Floyd, Sr., Defendants, Of whom Dustin Ryan Floyd is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2024-001617
Appeal From Greenville County Jerrod A. Anderson, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-079 Submitted February 21, 2025 โ Filed March 7, 2025
AFFIRMED
Matthew P. Head, of Head Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Rebecca Rush Wray, of South Carolina Department of Social Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Megan Goodwin Burke, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Dustin Ryan Floyd appeals the family court's final order terminating his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2024). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Floyd's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and GEATHERS and TURNER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.