Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2025

State v. Tamar J. Nance

State v. Tamar J. Nance
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Decided March 26, 2025

State v. Tamar J. Nance

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Tamar Javeell Nance, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2023-000172

Appeal From Lexington County Debra R. McCaslin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-101 Submitted March 1, 2025 – Filed March 26, 2025

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, and Tamar Javeell Nance, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 THOMAS, HEWITT, and CURTIS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.