State v. Carlos A. Cesmas-Gomez
State v. Carlos A. Cesmas-Gomez
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Carlos Alejandro Cesmas-Gomez, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-001192
Appeal From Fairfield County Brian M. Gibbons, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-109 Submitted March 20, 2025 – Filed March 26, 2025
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Attorney for Capital Appeals David Alexander, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and GEATHERS and TURNER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.