State v. Keyon E. D. Prophet
State v. Keyon E. D. Prophet
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Keyon Edsel Devonta Prophet, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-000752
Appeal From Richland County Jocelyn Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-116 Submitted March 1, 2025 – Filed April 2, 2025
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and GEATHERS and TURNER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.