SCDSS v. Victoria D. Hunnicutt
SCDSS v. Victoria D. Hunnicutt
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals South Carolina Department of Social Services, Respondent, v. Victoria Delaine Hunnicutt, Brandon Lee Clark, and Thomas Dylan Haney, Defendants, of whom Victoria Delaine Hunnicutt is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2025-000504
Appeal From Laurens County David J. Brousseau, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-319 Submitted September 15, 2025 โ Filed September 17, 2025
AFFIRMED
Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Ruffin Law Firm, LLC, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Ashley P. Case, of Fountain Inn, of the South Carolina Department of Social Services; and Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, of Potter Law, LLC, both for Respondent.
Meagan E. Johnson, of Virtual Legal Associates LLC, of Greenwood, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Victoria Delaine Hunnicutt appeals the family court's final order terminating her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. ยง 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2024). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Hunnicut's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and THOMAS and CURTIS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.