State v. Akeem D. Hampton
State v. Akeem D. Hampton
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Akeem Davon Hampton, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-001726
Appeal From Lexington County Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-325 Submitted September 1, 2025 – Filed October 1, 2025
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia; and Akeem Davon Hampton, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 MCDONALD, HEWITT, and TURNER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.