State v. Freddy R. Harris, III
State v. Freddy R. Harris, III
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Freddy Ray Harris, III, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-001165
Appeal From Darlington County Paul M. Burch, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2025-UP-411 Submitted October 1, 2025 – Filed December 10, 2025
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Freddy Ray Harris, III, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and THOMAS and CURTIS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.