State v. D'Quan Bolton
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. D'Quan Lamar Bolton, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2024-001275
Appeal From York County R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-202 Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 6, 2026
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, for Appellant.
General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.