In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Michael Terrance Lawyer

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of Michael Terrance Lawyer, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2024-001439

Appeal From Clarendon County R. Kirk Griffin, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-211 Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 6, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Kindle Kay Johnson, of K. Johnson Law Firm, LLC, of Charleston, and Michael Terrance Lawyer, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Christopher Runyan, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.