State v. Felicia Danielle Turnage

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Felicia Danielle Turnage, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2024-000225 Appeal From York County Daniel Dewitt Hall, Circuit Court Judge Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-237 Submitted April 1, 2026 – Filed May 20, 2026 APPEAL DISMISSED Appellate Defender Sarah Elizabeth Shipe, of Columbia, and Felicia Danielle Turnage, pro se, both for Appellant. General Counsel Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted. APPEAL DISMISSED.1 WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur. 1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.