State v. Roderick Shundale Dover
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Roderick Shundale Dover, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2025-000713
Appeal From Cherokee County J. Mark Hayes, II, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-242 Submitted May 1, 2026 – Filed May 20, 2026
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Jessica M. Saxon, of Columbia, and Roderick Shundale Dover, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1 THOMAS, MCDONALD, and TURNER, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.