State v. Seuvarrggio S. Rector
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Seuvarrggio Senwuez Rector, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2023-001513
Appeal From Greenville County Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-290 Submitted May 1, 2026 – Filed June 10, 2026
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, of Columbia, and Seuvarrggio Senwuez Rector, pro se, both for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown, both of Columbia; and Solicitor Cynthia Smith Crick, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 GEATHERS, HEWITT, and CURTIS, JJ., concur.
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.