State v. Emanuel Williams, IV

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Emanuel Williams, IV, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2023-001804

Appeal From Charleston County Perry H. Gravely, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2026-UP-291 Submitted May 1, 2026 – Filed June 10, 2026

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of Columbia, and Emanuel Williams, IV, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. 1 GEATHERS, HEWITT, and CURTIS, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.