Satur v. Satur
Opinion of the Court
This Cause comeing this day to be heard before this Court in the Presence of Council learned on Both sides, Mr. Hume (of Council for the Complainant) Moved that the Complainants Bill be now read And the same being Read accordingly, The Substance thereof appeared to be That Thomas Satur (the Defendants Father deceased) being greatly indebted to the Defendant, Had in his Lifetime Mortgaged several Lands in Dorchester in the said Bill particularly Set forth, and the said Mortgage being but a very Scanty Security and far from satisfying the Complainants said Debt It was Prayed That the Defendant, (being Heire at Law to the same Thomas Satur) might be foreclosed of and from all Equity of Redemption in and to the said Mortgaged premisses; Whereupon Mr. Lewis
John Lewis; he married Judith Lee Roche (LaRoche?) in 1729, and died in 1733 (St. Philip’s Register 1720-1758, pp. 159, 242).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.