IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Dwight Alan Armbrust, Jr., ) Civil Action No. 3:20-cv-00791-JMC ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) South Carolina Department of Employment ) and Workforce, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________)

This matter is before the court for review of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“Report”) filed on April 10, 2020. (ECF No. 15.) The Report addresses Plaintiff Dwight Alan Armbrust, Jr.’s pro se action seeking relief pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1965 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., against Defendant South Carolina Department of Employment and Workforce. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff alleges that Defendant discriminated against him based on race, color, and national origin. (ECF No. 1 at 4.) By order issued February 24, 2020, Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to submit the documents necessary to bring the case into proper form for evaluation and possible service of process. (ECF No. 8.) The “Proper Form Order” warned Plaintiff that a failure to provide the necessary documents by March 16, 2020, would subject his case to dismissal. (Id.) Plaintiff has not filed any documents and his time to respond has lapsed. Consequently, because Plaintiff has failed to prosecute his case and has failed to comply with an order of this court, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the court dismiss this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. (ECF No. 15.) Furthermore, the parties were apprised of their opportunity to file objections to the Report on April 10, 2020. (ECF No. 15.) Objections to the Report were due by April 24, 2020. (/d.) However, objections were due by April 27, 2020, if a party was served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (/d.) Neither party filed objections to the report. In the absence of timely objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report, this court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the recommendation. See Camby v. Davis,

(4th Cir. 1983). Instead, the court must only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation. Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.,

(4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note). After a thorough and careful review of the record, the court finds the Magistrate Judge’s Report provides an accurate summary of the facts and law in the instant case. (ECF No. 15.) Because there are no objections and no error, the court adopts the Report herein. Camby,

. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS the Report (ECF No. 15) and DISMISSES Plaintiff's action with prejudice! under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. IT IS SO ORDERED. ' i Wechalle. Chie United States District Judge April 30, 2020 Columbia, South Carolina

' Plaintiff was provided an opportunity to submit an amended complaint and failed to do so.