District Court, D. South Carolina, 2021

Avin v. Darlington County Sheriff's Office

Avin v. Darlington County Sheriff's Office
District Court, D. South Carolina · Decided June 22, 2021
Avin v. Darlington County Sheriff's Office

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA

FLORENCE DIVISION

Michael Donavan Avin, #19378, Case No.: 4:21-cv-00651-SAL Plaintiff, v.

OPINION AND ORDER

Darlington County Sheriff’s Office, Sheriff

Chavis, Director of Sex Offender Registry,

Defendants.

This matter is before the Court for review of the April 13, 2021 Report and Recommendation (“Report”) of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Rogers, III, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). [ECF No. 13]. In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Amended Complaint, ECF No. 9, be dismissed with prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Id. No party filed objections to the Report, and the time to do so has passed. See id.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this Court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270-71 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of only those portions of the Report that have been specifically objected to, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify the Report, in whole or in part. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of objections, the Court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report and must “only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note). After a thorough review of the Report, the applicable law, and the record of this case in accordance with the above standard, the Court finds no clear error, adopts the Report, and incorporates the Report by reference herein. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without issuance and service of process.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/Sherri A. Lydon

June 22, 2021 Sherri A. Lydon

Florence, South Carolina United States District Judge

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.