Energy One America LLC v. Christopher

District Court, D. South Carolina

Energy One America LLC v. Christopher

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

ENERGY ONE AMERICA, LLC, ) ) C.A. No. 2:21-cv-2067-RMG Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ORDER AND OPINION JAMES B. CHRISTOPHER, JR., ) CREATIVE BUILDING SOLUTIONS, ) INC. F/K/A ENVIROFOAM ) TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) ENVIROFOAM OF NORTH GEORGIA, ) LLC, and JAMES TRAVIS ) CHRISTOPHER, ) ) Defendants. )

This matter is before the Court upon Defendants James B. Christopher Jr., Creative Building Solutions, Inc. f/k/a Envirofoam Technologies, Inc., (“Creative Building Solutions”), Envirofoam of North Georgia, LLC, and James Travis Christopher’s Motion to Remand (Dkt. No. 8) and Plaintiff Energy One America, LLC’s (“Plaintiff”) Response to Defendants’ Motion to Remand. (Dkt. No. 10). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion to remand is granted. (Dkt. No. 8).1 On June 7, 2021, Plaintiff originally filed a Complaint in the Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County, South Carolina. (Dkt. No. 1-1).2 On July 12, 2021, Defendants filed a Notice of Removal, removing the case to federal court based upon Defendants’ belief that diversity

1 The parties agree that remanding this case to the Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County, South Carolina is appropriate on the ground complete diversity amongst the parties never existed. (Dkt Nos. 8; 10). 2 Plaintiff’s original state court action is captioned: Energy One America LLC v. James B. Christopher, Jr., Creative Building Solutions, Inc. F/K/A Envirofoam Technologies, Inc., Envirofoam of North Georgia, LLC, and James Travis Christopher, 2021-CP-10-02640. (Dkt. No. 1-1). jurisdiction was present in this action pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1332

. Notwithstanding, there is no diversity jurisdiction in this case because diversity of citizenship is lacking. Plaintiff, Energy One America LLC, is a limited liability company and for purposes of diversity jurisdiction limited liability companies are treated as unincorporated associations, akin to a partnership, whose citizenship is that of its members. Tech. Applications, Inc. v. Exro Ltda,

388 F.3d 114

, 121 (4th Cir. 2004). Defendants’ Notice of Removal alleges that Defendant Creative Building Solutions is a citizen of the State of Georgia. (Dkt. No. 1 at ¶ 6). Defendants’ Answer admits that Defendant Creative Building Solutions owns 4,482 Class A Units of Plaintiff, Energy One America LLC. (Dkt. No. 3, at ¶¶ 15-16). Consequently, because Plaintiff is a limited liability company and one of its members is a citizen of Georgia, Plaintiff is likewise a citizen of Georgia and complete diversity amongst the parties does not exist in this action. As such, the Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction over the claims in this action. For the reasons stated above, Defendants’ Motion to Remand is GRANTED. (Dkt. No. 8). The Court REMANDS this case to the Court of Common Pleas for Charleston County, South

Carolina. AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ Richard M. Gergel Richard M. Gergel United States District Judge

July 29, 2021 Charleston, South Carolina

Reference

Status
Unknown