Swann v. Fahnle
Swann v. Fahnle
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Michael Darnell Swann, Jr., ) C/A No. 9:20-cv-01629-SAL ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) OPINION & ORDER ) Robin Fahnle and South Carolina ) Department of Probation & Parole, ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )
This matter is before the court for review of the August 31, 2021 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Molly H. Cherry (the “Report”), made in accordance with
28 U.S.C. § 636and Local Civil Rule 73.02 (D.S.C.). [ECF No. 35.] In the Report, the Magistrate Judge recommends dismissal for failure to prosecute.
Id.Plaintiff was advised of his right to file objections to the Report.
Id. at p.4. No party filed objections to the Report, and the time for response has lapsed. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber,
423 U.S. 261, 270–71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of only those portions of the Report that have been specifically objected to, and the court may accept, reject, or modify the Report, in whole or in part.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). In the absence of objections, the court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report and must “only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.,
416 F.3d 310, 315(4th Cir. 2005) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note). After a thorough review of the Report, the applicable law, and the record of this case in accordance with the above standard, the court finds no clear error, adopts the Report, ECF No. 35, and incorporates the Report by reference herein. In accordance with Rule 41(b), FRCP and the factors outlined in Chandler Leasing Corp. v. Lopez,
669 F.2d 919, 920(4th Cir. 1982), Plaintiff’s
action is hereby DISMISSED for lack of prosecution. The Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 30, is rendered MOOT by this ruling. IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Sherri A. Lydon______________ United States District Judge September 23, 2021 Florence, South Carolina
Reference
- Status
- Unknown