White v. Barnes

District Court, D. South Carolina

White v. Barnes

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Willie James White, Case No. 2:20-cv-02358-TLW PETITIONER v. Order Warden of F.C.I. Bennettsville, RESPONDENT

Petitioner Willie James White, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2241

. ECF No. 1. The matter now comes before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) filed by the magistrate judge to whom this case was assigned. ECF No. 6. In the Report, the magistrate judge recommends that the petition be summarily dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Petitioner did not file objections to the Report. This matter is now ripe for decision. The Court is charged with conducting a review of any portion of the Report to which a specific objection is registered, and may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendations contained in that Report.

28 U.S.C. § 636

. In the absence of objections to the Report, the Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation. ,

718 F.2d 198, 200

(4th Cir. 1983). In such a case, “a district court need not conduct a review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.’” ,

416 F.3d 310, 315

(4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note). The Court has carefully reviewed the Report. For the reasons stated by the

magistrate judge, the Report, ECF No. 6, is ACCEPTED. This action is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Terry L. Wooten Senior United States District Judge August 2, 2022 Columbia, South Carolina

Reference

Status
Unknown