District Court, D. South Carolina, 2023

Garrick v. Austin

Garrick v. Austin
District Court, D. South Carolina · Decided May 4, 2023
Garrick v. Austin

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Deborah Garrick, C/A No.: 3:22-cv-2332-SAL-PJG Plaintiff, v. ORDER Calvin Moxley; Lloyd J. Austin, III, Secretary U.S. Department of Defense; Brian Dual; Alexia Pamplin; Dr. Raymond Burk, Defendants.

This matter is before the court for review of the November 9, 2022 Report and Recommendation (the “Report”) of United States Magistrate Judge Paige J. Gossett, made in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(b) and Local Civil Rule 73.02(B)(2) (D.S.C.). [ECF No. 24.] In the Report, the magistrate judge recommends summarily dismissing Defendants Calvin Moxley, Brian Dual, Alexia Pamplin, and Dr. Raymond Burk without prejudice and without issuance of service of process. Id. at 3. Attached to the Report was a notice advising Plaintiff of the procedures and requirements for filing objections to the Report. Id. at 4. Plaintiff has not filed objections, and the time for doing so has expired.

The magistrate judge makes only a recommendation to this court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight, and the responsibility to make a final determination remains with this court. See Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270–71 (1976). The court is charged with making a de novo determination of only those portions of the Report that have been specifically objected to, and the court may accept, reject, or modify the Report, in whole or in part. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

In the absence of objections, the court is not required to provide an explanation for adopting the Report and must “only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note).

After a thorough review of the Report, the applicable law, and the record of this case in accordance with the above standard, the court finds no clear error, adopts the Report, ECF No. 24, and incorporates the Report by reference herein. Defendants Calvin Moxley, Brian Dual, Alexia Pamplin, and Dr. Raymond Burk are DISMISSED without prejudice and without issuance of service of process. This matter continues to be referred to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Sherri A. Lydon May 4, 2023 Sherri A. Lydon Columbia, South Carolina United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.