= 3 Be

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION CORINTHEA STACK, LYNN K. STACK, § Plaintiffs, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-2634-MGL-PJG § § BROCK & SCOTT PLLC, CHAD W. § BURGESS, LISA M. COMER, JAMES O. § SPENCE, W. JEFFREY BARNES, SEAN § ADEGBOLA, and LPS DEFAULT § SOLUTIONS, INC, § Defendants. § ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiffs Corinthea Stack and Lynn K. Stack (the Stacks) filed this lawsuit against Defendants Brock & Scott PLLC, Chad W. Burgess, Lisa M. Comer, James O. Spence, W. Jeffrey Barnes, Sean Adegbola, and LPS Default Solutions Inc, The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting to the Court the case be dismissed without prejudice. The Report was made in accordance with

and Local Civil Rule 73.02 for the District of South Carolina. The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber,

(1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo

determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions.

(b)(1). The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on July 21, 2023, but the Stacks failed to file any

objections. “[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.’” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co.,

(4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins,

(4th Cir. 1985). After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of

the Court this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed this 8th day of August, 2023, in Columbia, South Carolina. /s/ Mary Geiger Lewis MARY GEIGER LEWIS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *****

NOTICE OF RIGHT TO APPEAL The parties are hereby notified of the right to appeal this Order within thirty days from the date hereof, pursuant to Rules 3 and 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.