Mia Tucker v. Kevin McClanahan

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA Mia Tucker, ) C/A No.: 3:26-334-MGL-SVH ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) REPORT AND ) RECOMMENDATION Kevin McClanahan, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Mia Tucker (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed this action on January 30, 2026. [ECF No. 1]. On February 4, 2026, the undersigned issued an order directing Plaintiff to submit document necessary to bring this case into proper form. [ECF No. 4]. The order also directed Plaintiff to keep this court apprised of her address. . On March 2, 2026, the order was returned as undeliverable. [ECF No. 6]. The returned envelope states “Return to Sender, Not Deliverable as Addressed” and “NSN.” . As a result of Plaintiff having failed to provide this court with an accurate address, this court has no means of contacting Plaintiff.

Based on the foregoing, it is recommended that this action be dismissed, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Clerk is directed to send this Report and Recommendation to Plaintiff at her last known address.

If Plaintiff notifies the court within the time set for filing objections to this Report and Recommendation that she wishes to continue with this case and provides a current address, the Clerk is directed to vacate this Report and Recommendation and return this file to the undersigned for further handling.

If, however, no objections are filed, the Clerk shall forward this Report and Recommendation to the district judge for disposition.

IT 1S SO RECOMMENDED.

PP Ut Slalger March 2, 2026 Shiva V. Hodges Columbia, South Carolina United States Magistrate Judge The parties are directed to note the important information in the attached “Notice of Right to File Objections to Report and Recommendation.”

Notice of Right to File Objections to Report and Recommendation The parties are advised that they may file specific written objections to this Report and Recommendation with the District Judge. Objections must specifically identify the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections are made and the basis for such objections. “[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.’” , 416 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee’s note).

Specific written objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days of the date of service of this Report and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a), (d). Filing by mail pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 may be accomplished by mailing objections to: Robin L. Blume, Clerk United States District Court Richland Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 Failure to timely file specific written objections to this Report and Recommendation will result in waiver of the right to appeal from a judgment of the District Court based upon such Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); , 474 U.S. 140 (1985); , 766 F.2d 841 (4th Cir. 1985); , 727 F.2d 91 (4th Cir. 1984).