Courtois v. Perquier

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Courtois v. Perquier, 3 S.C.L. 314 (S.C. 1804)
Brevard, Johnson, Trezevant

Courtois v. Perquier

Opinion of the Court

The court, after hearing argument by Gaillard, for the motion, and Bailey, contra, were of opinion, that the undertaking of defendant was direct, and not collateral, and made upon sufficient consideration ; and, being for a sum certain, was good and effectual *315to bind him to a peiformance; and, therefore, refused a new trial. See 9 Co. 93, Bane’s case.

Present, Johnson, Trezevant, and Brevard, Justices,

Reference

Status
Published