Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1806

Rodrigue v. Fronty

Rodrigue v. Fronty
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided January 15, 1806 · Bay, Brevard, Grimke, Jjces, Trezevant, Wilds
4 S.C.L. 31

Rodrigue v. Fronty

Opinion of the Court

The court,

Grimke, Bay, Trezevant, Brevard, and Wilds,-jU6jjceS-

Were all clearly of opinion that the plaintiff was intitled to' a new trial. That the law is now settled that a 6are acknowledg. ment of an existing debt, without any evidence of a promise to pay,will lake it out of the statute of limitations. See 1 Esp. Rep. 435. See Wallace’s Rep. 66. Cowan v. Magauran. See the case of Aiken v. Benton, 3d vol. 289.

New trial granted.-

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.