Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1812

State v. Hill

State v. Hill
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided December 3, 1812 · Bail, Brevaed, Colcock, Geimke, Nott, Power, Same
5 S.C.L. 89

Counsel

Argued by S, Faeeow, and Ceeswell, for the prisoner; and by Mr. Solicitor Taylor, for the State., Smith, J., contra.

State v. Hill

Opinion of the Court

Geimke, J.,

of the same opinion, except in extraordinary cases, where there is a contagious distemper in the prison, &c.

Brevaed, Nott, and Colcock, Js.,

were of opinion the court ought to exercise a discretion in considering and deciding on affidavits produced, although they may tend to controvert the finding of the jury : but Nott, and Colcock, Js., were of opinion that the judge had done so in this case. He refused to héar the affidavits read.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.