Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1812

Boyd v. Brent

Boyd v. Brent
Supreme Court of South Carolina · Decided November 15, 1812 · Brevard
6 S.C.L. 101

Counsel

Nott,for the Motion, , Clifton, Contra.

Boyd v. Brent

Opinion of the Court

Brevard, J.

In legal strictness the defendant ought to have demurred to the declaration; but the question now is, whether we shall set aside the non-suit and arrant a new trial: and in deciding this ° . , question, if we see that no good purpose can be answered by setting the non-suit aside, we ought to exercise a sound discretion and not grant the motion. The words charged are not actionable; and if ^ # plaintiff should even obtain a verdict, the judgment would be arrested. 1 Com. Big. 179. 255, 256. 4 Co. 20. 7 Co. 44. 2 Inst. 492. 6 Com. Big. 131. 2 T. JR. 483. 2 Inst. 478. 1 Com. Big. 274. 276. I will not say what my opinion would he, if I had the power to make the law. As my duty is confined to declaring what the law is, I must say that the non-suit ought not be set aside.

The other Judges concurred.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.