The opinion of the Court was delivered by

If the plaintiff’s- title^had depended on the conveyance of the surviving executor alone, it could not have supported his action, for it was made before the Act of 1787, (P. L. 423, 1 Brev. Dig. 332,)1 which gives the power to a majority of the qualified electors, under a will, to sell; it was, therefore, ineffectual by the statute, 21 Henry 8, chap, 4, (P. L. 45, 1 Brev. Dig. 327,)2 where this power is delegated to executors. Those who qualify, and take upon themselves the execution of a will, are required *all to’join in the conveyance.' But as the Court of Equity had decreed a title to be made by the heirs at law, and that title had been executed, the plaintiff was entitled to his recovery; no other objection having been made to his title. It was not necessary that the surviving executor should have signed the deed made by the heirs, or any other new deed.