Martin v. Bacon
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
It is the peculiar province of a J ury to decide all questions of fact; by this, however, it is not to be understood, that the final determination of every case in which questions of fact are involved, are alone to be decided by a J ury; for when it is dear to demonstration, from the facts stated, that is impossible to infer from them any thing which can go to charge a party, it then becomes a question of law, to decide which is the peculiar province of the Court. If, then, it was impossible to infer from the facts sworn to in this case, that there was any thing which amounted to sufficient evidence of an acceptance, or any thing from which it could possibly be inferred, I think the Court erred in submitting it to the consideration of the Jury; and ought to have non-suited the plaintiff, or directed the Jury to find a verdict for the defendant.
As to what shall, or shall not, constitute or amount to sufficient evidence of an acceptance, I take the rule to be, that there must be something from which it can fairly be inferred, that a confidence was reposed in, or a credit given
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.