Price v. Jenkins
Price v. Jenkins
Opinion of the Court
*The opinion of the Court was delivered by
The testimony on the part of the plaintiff was perfect, and entitled him to a verdict, unless the defendant made out a defence by sufficient proof. The testimony adduced by the- defendant, was without precision, and remote in its application to the points of the defence. It consisted almost altogether of the circumstance, that the payee was poor, or rather in embarrassed circumstances. It was calculated to raise doubts in the mind; but by no means to establish belief. If the verdict of the jury had been for the defendant, I incline to think, it could not have been sustained. As it was for the plaintiff, of course, I can have no disposition to disturb it, on this ground.
It has been long the established practice of this Court, not to grant new trials, on the ground, that parol evidence has been discovered since the trial.
On both grounds, we think the motion ought to be refused.
See 2 vol. 452, and note.
Dissenting Opinion
I dissent. The evidence ought, in my opinion, to have been allowed.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thomas W. Price, Administrator of Philip S. Smith, ads. C. J. Jenkins, of John Jenkins
- Status
- Published