Administrators of Norwood v. Manning
Administrators of Norwood v. Manning
Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Oourt was delivered by
This case has been submitted without argument; and I am, therefore, at some loss to conjecture upon what ground the defendant’s counsel expected to support his motion. That an action of debt can be brought on a judgment, there can be no doubt. And I am not aware, that merely lodging an execution in the sheriff’s office can be a bar to that action. That motion, therefore, must be dismissed.
The question, arising on the second ground, appears *to me to have been settled by former decisions of this Court. In the L case of Lambkin v. Nance,
It is a mistaken view of the subject, to suppose, that when a payment is made, it goes in extinguishment of the principal. The rule has always been with us to apply it to the extinguishment of interest first; and, therefore, though the whole amount appearing on the face of a judgment be paid, yet it must be deducted from the aggregate amount of principal and interest, and the balance is principal; and that has been the mode of calculation long established in this State.
The last motion, therefore, must be granted, and let the calculation be made according to the method first adopted by the clerk.
2 Brev. 99.
MS. See 1 N. & MeC. 245.
Dissenting Opinion
I dissent to this opinion as it relates to the assessment. The interest is recoverable, but does not follow the judgment as a matter of course; and, therefore, the payments before the recovery of the interest, must be applied to. the original judgment.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- The Administrators of G. Norwood ads. Mark Manning
- Cited By
- 2 cases
- Status
- Published